Skip to Main Content
Prof. Justin Levitt's Doug Spencer's Guide to Drawing the Electoral Lines
Illinois | State Upper | State Lower

Contreras v. Ill. State Bd. of Elections

Last Updated Dec 30, 2021
Case No. 1:21-cv-03139 (N.D. Ill.)
Cycle 2020

Featured Content

Highlighted documents

Case Information

A federal court challenge to Illinois state legislative redistricting plans. In order to meet the June 30, 2021 deadline for new legislative maps, the Illinois state Legislature enacted maps, signed by Gov. Pritzker, using American Community Survey (ACS) data instead of decennial Census data (which were not available until mid-August). The Legislature adopted new maps, also signed by Gov. Pritzker, in September using official Census data.

Plaintiffs challenge the constitutionality of both sets of maps: the June maps for relying on the wrong data, and the September maps for being drawn after the state’s redistricting deadline.

The court ordered a three-judge panel to hear the case concurrently with the related case McConchie v. Ill. State Board of Elections. Plaintiff’s moved for summary judgment and Defendants—the Legislature and state Board of Elections—moved to dismiss the action (see BOE MTD and Welch MTD).  The court denied the motions to dismiss and granted the Plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment. The court held the June Redistricting Plan violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and enjoined the defendants from enacting that plan.

The court will use September Redistricting Plan as a starting point to finalize a legislative redistricting plan. Plaintiffs have until November 8 to propose revisions to the September Redistricting Plan. The defendants will have until November 18th to respond or object to those revisions.

On December 30th the Court held the September Redistricting Plan did not violate the Voting Rights Act or the Constitution.

History

Case filings, starting with most recent court
    Name Last Modified
Document icon Complaint Jun 10, 2021
Document icon Order assigning three judge panel Jun 28, 2021
Document icon Board of Election's motion to dismiss Jul 16, 2021
Document icon Amd. complaint Jul 28, 2021
Document icon Plaintiff's motion to compel Aug 11, 2021
Document icon Opposition Aug 14, 2021
Document icon Reply Aug 16, 2021
Document icon Order re motion to compel Aug 20, 2021
Document icon Board of Election's motion to dismiss Aug 11, 2021
Document icon Opposition Aug 25, 2021
Document icon Rep. Angelica Guerrero-Cuellar motion to intervene Aug 19, 2021
Document icon Opposition Aug 27, 2021
Document icon Reply Aug 31, 2021
Document icon Rep. Angelica Guerrero-Cuellar motion to withdraw Sep 7, 2021
Document icon Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (incl. exhs) Aug 20, 2021
Document icon Opposition (incl. exhs) Sep 10, 2021
Document icon Leg. leader's opposition Sep 10, 2021
Document icon Reply Sep 14, 2021
Document icon Plaintiff's motion to compel Sep 30, 2021
Document icon Opposition Oct 5, 2021
Document icon Reply Oct 6, 2021
Document icon Second amd. complaint Oct 1, 2021
Document icon Leg. leaders answer Oct 15, 2021
Highlighted document Document icon Opinion and order Oct 19, 2021
Document icon Clarification Oct 25, 2021
Document icon Plaintiff's proposed remedial plan (incl. exhs.) Nov 10, 2021
Document icon Response Nov 24, 2021
Document icon Amicus brief of Chi. NAACP Nov 18, 2021
Document icon Opposition Nov 22, 2021
Highlighted document Document icon Opinion Dec 30, 2021

Map | Updated (09.24.21) challeged state house map

Download Data

Map | Updated (09.24.21) challeged state senate map

Download Data

Map | Initial (06.04.21) challenged state house map

Download Data

Map | Initial (06.04.21) challenged state senate map

Download Data

Additional Cases

Federal court challenge to state legislative redistricting plans alleging unconstitutional use of ACS data and failure to meet deadline.
Cycle 2020
Federal court challenge to state legislature redistricting plan.
Cycle 2020