Maryland

Maryland’s congressional lines are drawn by the state legislature, as a regular statute, subject to gubernatorial veto.

For state legislative lines, the governor submits a proposed plan at the start of the legislative session.  In January 2021, the governor established a nine-person advisory commission to assist with the process (and also to draft a proposed congressional map).  The governor appointed one member of each major party and one registered with neither; those three in turn appointed two other members of each major party and two registered with neither, from public applications.  Commissioners were not permitted to be candidates for or employees of state or federal legislative office, party employees, or lobbyists; the commission did not consider voting patterns or candidate residence.  The state legislature could adopt, modify, or ignore the commission’s proposals. The commission members for the 2020 cycle are listed here.

If the state legislature does not successfully pass a joint resolution (without the possibility of gubernatorial veto) to redraw state legislative lines within 45 days, the governor’s plan becomes law. [Md. Const. art. III, § 5]

The Maryland constitution vests original jurisdiction in the state Supreme Court for review of state legislative lines in state court. There is no similar provision for congressional lines. [Md. Const. art. III, § 5]

Maryland state law does not impose a particular deadline for drawing congressional lines, though candidates were required to file for congressional primary elections by Feb. 22, 2022. [Md. Code, Election Law, § 5-303(a)]  The legislative session began on Jan. 13, 2021, and ended on Apr. 12, 2021, with a special session Dec. 6-9, 2021.

For state legislative lines, if the state legislature does not pass a joint resolution within 45 days of the start of the session two years after the federal Census is conducted, the governor’s proposal would become law; because the session began on Jan. 12, 2022, that 45-day deadline was Feb. 26, 2022. [Md. Const. art. III, § 5]  Candidates were originally required to have filed for state legislative primary elections by Feb. 22, 2022, but the state supreme court extended the deadline to Mar. 22, 2022, amidst ongoing litigation challenges.  [Md. Code, Election Law, § 5-303(a); Order, In re 2022 Legislative Districting, Misc. No. 21 (Md. Feb. 11, 2022)]

The Maryland constitution ties the drawing of state legislative lines to the Census, and might therefore be construed to prohibit redrawing lines mid-decade; there is no similar provision pertaining to congressional lines. [Md. Const. art. III, § 5]

The Maryland constitution requires public hearings before the Governor submits a proposed state legislative plan to the legislature. [Md. Const. art. III, § 5]

The Maryland Citizens Redistricting Commission launched a portal to allow members of the public to submit proposed redistricting plans online. The Commission also hosted public meetings every Wednesday in October 2021.

Like all states, Maryland must comply with constitutional equal population requirements. [Md. Const. art. III, § 4; Legislative Redistricting Cases, 629 A.2d 646 (Md. 1993)] Maryland adjusts census data for both congressional and state legislative districts in order to count incarcerated individuals at their last known residence before incarceration. [Md. Code, State Gov’t, § 2-2A-01; Md. Code, Election Law, § 8-701]

Maryland must also, like all states, abide by the Voting Rights Act and constitutional rules on race.

The Maryland constitution further requires that state legislative districts be contiguous and compact, and that they give “due regard” for political boundaries and natural features. There are no similar provisions for congressional districts. [Md. Const. art. III, § 4; In re Legislative Districting, 475 A.2d 428 (Md. 1984)]  Three state representatives are elected from each state Senate district; the three state representatives may be elected from a multimember district, or from three state House districts nested within a state Senate district. [Md. Const. art. III, § 3]

The Maryland legislature passed a congressional plan (HB1) on Dec. 8, 2021. The governor vetoed that plan on Dec. 9, 2021, but the veto was overridden the same day.   The congressional plan was challenged in state court, and struck on Mar. 25, 2022, as a partisan gerrymander in violation of the state constitution.  [Szeliga v. Lamone, No. C-02-CV-21-001816 (Md. Cir. Ct., Anne Arundel Cnty. Mar. 25, 2022)] The legislature passed a remedial congressional plan (SB 1012) on Mar. 19, which the governor signed on Apr. 4, 2022.  That plan was not further challenged in court.

The governor convened an advisory commission to draw state legislative lines; the commission released its plan on Nov. 5, 2021, and that plan was introduced in the legislature (HJR 1) on Jan. 12, 2022.  However, the legislature enacted a different plan (SJR 2) on Feb. 1, 2022; that plan was not subject to gubernatorial veto. The plan was challenged in state court, but the challenges were ultimately rejected.  [In the Matter of 2022 Legislative Districting of the State, 282 A.3d 147 (Md. 2022)]

The Maryland legislature passed a congressional plan (SB 1) on Oct. 20, 2011, which was signed by the governor the same day.  A referendum campaign placed the plan on the ballot; that referendum was defeated, and the maps were approved, in the Nov. 2012 elections.

On Dec. 16, 2011, the governor’s advisory commission released a proposed state legislative map; on Jan. 11, 2012, the governor released a slightly modified version — the state Senate (SJR 1) and state House (HJR 1) — as his final proposal to the legislature. Without legislative action in the next 45 days, the governor’s proposal became law on Feb. 24, 2012.

The congressional plans were challenged in state and federal court, and the state legislative plans were challenged in state court.  All of the challenges were ultimately rejected.  [Lamone v. Benisek, 139 S. Ct. 2484 (2019); Bouchat v. Maryland, No. 1:15-cv-02417, 2016 WL 4699415 (D. Md. Sept. 7, 2016); Parrott v. Lamone, No. 1:15-cv-01849, 2016 WL 4445319 (D. Md. Aug. 24, 2016), dismissed on jurisdiction, 137 S. Ct. 654 (2017); Bouchat v. Maryland, No. 06C15068061 (Md. Cir. Ct., Carroll Cnty. May 1, 2015); In the Matter of 2012 Legislative Districting of the State, 80 A.3d 1073 (Md. 2013); Olson v. O’Malley, No. 1:12-cv-0240, 2012 WL 764421 (D. Md. Mar. 6, 2012); Olson v. O’Malley, Misc. No. 13 (Md. Ct. Appeals Jan. 10, 2012); Gorrell v. O’Malley, 1:11-cv-02975, 2012 WL 226919 (D. Md. Jan. 19, 2012); Fletcher v. Lamone, 831 F. Supp. 2d 887 (D. Md. 2011), aff’d, 133 S. Ct. 29 (2012); Martin v. Maryland, No. 1:11-cv-00904, 2011 WL 5151755 (D. Md. Oct. 27, 2011)]

The Maryland legislature enacted congressional plans (SB 805), signed on May 6, 2002. The legislature did not pass state legislative plans, so the governor’s proposals for state Senate (SJR 3) and state House (HJR 3) became law on Feb. 22, 2002.

The congressional plan was challenged in federal court, and upheld. The state legislative plan was challenged in state court, and struck down largely on grounds that the plan failed to give “due regard” to political boundaries. The court adopted its own plan on June 21, 2002.  [In re Legislative Districting, 805 A.2d 292 (Md. 2002); Duckworth v. State Admin. Bd. of Elections, 332 F.3d 769 (4th Cir. 2003); Kimble v. State Bd. of Elections, 120 Fed. Appx. 466 (4th Cir. 2005)]