Miller v. Thurston I
Featured Content
Highlighted documents
Fed. trial ct.
Opinion granting prelim. injunction
Fed. app. ct.
Opinion reversing trial ct.
Case Information
A federal court challenge by proponents of a redistricting initiative to the deadline and signature threshold for initiatives, and the requirement to sign and/or notarize documents in person, in light of COVID-19.
On May 25, 2020, the trial court preliminarily enjoined Arkansas’ requirement that petitioners sign in the presence of a canvasser, and the requirement for canvassers to notarize signature pages, but declined to require the state to accept e-signatures or to modify signature thresholds.
OnĀ July 23, 2020, the court of appeals reversed, finding no constitutional burden for the notarization requirement, and only a limited burden for the requirement to sign in the presence of a canvasser.
History
Case filings, starting with most recent courtName | Last Modified | ||
---|---|---|---|
Complaint | Apr 22, 2020 | ||
Motion for prelim. injunction (incl. exhs.) | Apr 22, 2020 | ||
Opposition (incl. exh.) | May 4, 2020 | ||
Reply (incl. exh.) | May 6, 2020 | ||
Joint statement of stipulated facts | May 11, 2020 | ||
Plaintiff's statement of facts | May 11, 2020 | ||
Motion to dismiss | May 12, 2020 | ||
Opposition | May 26, 2020 | ||
Opinion granting prelim. injunction | May 25, 2020 | ||
Opinion making injunction permanent | May 29, 2020 | ||
Notice of appeal | Jun 1, 2020 |
Name | Last Modified | ||
---|---|---|---|
State's opening brief (incl. add.) | Jun 18, 2020 | ||
Plaintiffs' brief | Jun 22, 2020 | ||
Amicus brief of Chamber of Commerce | Jun 23, 2020 | ||
State's reply | Jun 25, 2020 | ||
Opinion reversing trial ct. | Jul 23, 2020 |