Skip to Main Content
Prof. Justin Levitt's Doug Spencer's Guide to Drawing the Electoral Lines
National | Congress

Useche v. Trump

Last Updated Jan 25, 2021
Case No. 8:20-cv-02225 (D. Md.), No. 20-662 (S. Ct.)
Cycle 2020

Featured Content

Highlighted documents

Case Information

A federal court challenge to the exclusion of undocumented individuals from the apportionment count of the whole number of persons in a state.  On Nov. 6, 2020, a three-judge federal trial court declared that federal statutes require the apportionment count to include all persons, and enjoined the Census Bureau from including any information other than the total population in the statement delivered to the President for apportionment purposes.  That decision has been appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court.

The decision (along with California v. Trump and San Jose v. Trump) was appealed directly to the U.S. Supreme Court. On Dec. 28, 2020, following the decision in New York v. Trump, the Court vacated and remanded the case with instructions to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The case was formally dismissed on Jan. 25, 2021

 

 

History

Case filings, starting with most recent court

Additional Cases

PENDING - Federal court challenge to exclusion of undocumented persons from apportionment count
Cycle 2020
PENDING - Federal court challenge to exclusion of undocumented persons from apportionment count
Cycle 2020
Supreme Court rejected challenge to exclusion of undocumented persons from apportionment count on standing grounds
Cycle 2020
Supreme Court rejected challenge to exclusion of undocumented persons from apportionment count on standing grounds
Cycle 2020
Supreme Court rejected challenge to exclusion of undocumented persons from apportionment count on standing grounds
Cycle 2020
Supreme Court rejected challenge to exclusion of undocumented persons from apportionment count on standing grounds
Cycle 2020