Banerian v. Benson
No. 1:22-cv-00054 (W.D. Mich.)
Featured Content
Highlighted documents
W.D. Mich.
Amended complaint
6th Cir.
Order establishing three-judge panel
Case Information
Federal court challenge to Michigan’s new congressional districts. Plaintiffs allege that the new districts violate the one person, one vote rule, the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, and that the maps violate the state constitution by failing to preserve communities of interest and by splitting counties and townships.
On April 1, 2022, the court denied the requested relief.
History
Case filings, starting with most recent court| Name | Last Modified | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
Complaint (incl. exhbs) | Jan 20, 2022 | |
|
|
Amended complaint | Jan 27, 2022 |
|
|
Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment (incl. exhbs) | Jan 27, 2022 | |
|
|
Plaintiffs' motion to expedite motion for summary judgment | Feb 4, 2022 | |
|
|
Plaintiffs' motion for expedited oral argument | Feb 9, 2022 | |
|
|
Order denying motion to expedite oral argument | Feb 11, 2022 | |
|
|
Answer to amended complaint (Intervenors) | Feb 11, 2022 | |
|
|
Answer to amended complaint (Commission) | Feb 18, 2022 | |
|
|
Answer to amended complaint (Sec. Benson) | Feb 18, 2022 | |
|
|
Commission's opposition to motion for PI (incl. exhbs) | Feb 18, 2022 | |
|
|
Secretary Benson's opposition to motion for PI (incl. exhbs) | Feb 18, 2022 | |
|
|
Order granting partial motion to dismiss | Mar 4, 2022 | |
|
|
Opinion denying preliminary injunction | Apr 1, 2022 |
| Name | Last Modified | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
Order establishing three-judge panel | Feb 1, 2022 |
