Skip to Main Content
Prof. Justin Levitt's Doug Spencer's Guide to Drawing the Electoral Lines
Michigan | State Supreme | Congress | State Upper | State Lower

Detroit Caucus v. Independent Citizens Redistricting Commission

Last Updated Feb 16, 2022
Case number

MSC No. 163926

Cycle 2020

Featured Content

Highlighted documents

Case Information

State court action seeking to have recently-enacted congressional redistricting plans declared unconstitutional based on their potential to dilute the voting power of minority communities.

On Feb. 3, 2022 the state supreme court dismissed the complaint on a vote of 4-3, holding that:

“Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that the Commission’s adopted plans are noncompliant with Const 1963, art 4, § 6(13)(a).”

Article 4 § 6(13)(a) of the state constitution requires the commission to draw maps that “comply with the voting rights act and other federal laws.” On the commission’s choice not to draw more majority-minority districts, the majority opinion held:

“Plaintiffs have not identified grounds or legal authority that would allow us to question the Commission’s decision not to draw race-based, majority-minority districts. That decision was the correct one precisely because there was no “strong basis in evidence” providing “good reason” for the Commission to believe that the three threshold Gingles preconditions were satisfied so as to potentially require race-based district lines in order to avoid liability for vote dilution under § 2 of the VRA.”


Case filings, starting with most recent court
    Name Last Modified
Document icon Complaint Jan 5, 2022
Document icon Commission's Answer Jan 18, 2022
Highlighted document Document icon Order denying complaint Feb 3, 2022
Document icon Order denying motion to reconsider Feb 16, 2022

Map | Congress

Download Data

Shapefile GeoJSON

Map | State Senate

Download Data

Shapefile GeoJSON

Map | State House

Download Data

Shapefile GeoJSON