Skip to Main Content
Prof. Justin Levitt's Doug Spencer's Guide to Drawing the Electoral Lines
Arkansas | Process

Miller v. Thurston I

Last Updated Jul 23, 2020
Case No. 5:20-cv-05070 (W.D. Ark.), No. 20-2095 (8th Cir.)
Cycle 2020

Case Information

A federal court challenge by proponents of a redistricting initiative to the deadline and signature threshold for initiatives, and the requirement to sign and/or notarize documents in person, in light of COVID-19.

On May 25, 2020, the trial court preliminarily enjoined Arkansas’ requirement that petitioners sign in the presence of a canvasser, and the requirement for canvassers to notarize signature pages, but declined to require the state to accept e-signatures or to modify signature thresholds.  On  July 23, 2020, the court of appeals reversed, finding no constitutional burden for the notarization requirement, and only a limited burden for the requirement to sign in the presence of a canvasser.


Case filings, starting with most recent court

Additional Cases

State court rejected challenge to invalidation of petition signatures for ballot initiative
Cycle 2020
Federal court rejected challenge to invalidation of signatures based on background check certification
Cycle 2020