Howell v. Md. State Bd. of Elections
Featured Content
Highlighted documents
State trial ct.
Opinion rejecting ballot measure
State sup. ct.
Opinion reinstating proposed amd.
Case Information
A state challenge to Maryland’s new proposed constitutional amendment on congressional redistricting criteria, alleging that the language was passed in violation of state procedural requirements and that it violates the state’s single-subject rule.
On Aug. 26, 2026, the trial court granted summary judgment to the challengers, finding that the proposed amendment was untimely, inaccurately described, and contained multiple subjects.
On Sept. 3, 2026, the state supreme court reversed, reinstating the proposed amendment on the November ballot. The court found that it met necessary procedural requirements, but found the summary misleading, and rewrote the summary for the ballot.
History
Case filings, starting with most recent court| Name | Last Modified | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
Complaint | Aug 6, 2026 | |
| 1st amd. complaint [Document not yet available] | Aug 24, 2026 | ||
| Plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment [Document not yet available] | Aug 17, 2026 | ||
| State's opposition [Document not yet available] | Aug 21, 2026 | ||
| Proposed findings [Document not yet available] | Aug 21, 2026 | ||
|
|
Transcript of argument | Aug 25, 2026 | |
|
|
|
Opinion rejecting ballot measure | Aug 26, 2026 |
|
|
Notice of appeal | Aug 26, 2026 | |
| State's motion for summary judgment [Document not yet available] | Aug 17, 2026 | ||
| Plaintiffs' opposition [Document not yet available] | Aug 21, 2026 | ||
|
|
Transcript of argument | Aug 25, 2026 | |
|
|
|
Opinion rejecting ballot measure | Aug 26, 2026 |
|
|
Notice of appeal | Aug 26, 2026 |
| Name | Last Modified | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
State's brief | Aug 28, 2026 | |
|
|
Record on appeal | Aug 28, 2026 | |
|
|
Plaintiff's response | Sep 1, 2026 | |
|
|
Supplemental record | Sep 1, 2026 | |
|
|
State's reply | Sep 2, 2026 | |
|
|
|
Opinion reinstating proposed amd. | Sep 3, 2026 |